IIUI, Rector and Recent Scandals: The Other Side of the Picture

In response to our last post, we received several comments sharing certain concerns about different aspects of the situation prevailing right now in IIUI. As we maintain principle of neutrality and fairness so it is important show other side of the picture as will. Please see following three comments:

----------------------

1. Reading the Charge Sheet against Professor Fateh Malik, one is struck by the crude language of the “Daughters and Sisters” of Ummah and it is sad to see the letter appearing on your blog. It seems that some vested interests are operating behind this letter against the rector in the wake of recent scandals in IIUI. What is most horrible in the charge sheet is the nature of charges which require the proper proof under Islamic Law. In case they cannot come up with such proof, they should be ready for the punishment of “buhtan” in Islamic Law. All those associated with IIUI should avoid washing their dirty linen in the public.

2. I think this type of secret letters are hallmark of jamiat groups in IIUI ,they are filthy and full of defamatory items agaiinst peolple whom they want to remove. Allah is forgotten by these people in such letters and they think they are reformers of the world appointed by God.I only seek protection of allah frm such groups who write such letters. we have very few senior academics left in pakistan, and Dr Malik has always shown respect to females. if females themselves are dying for such scandals then allah is the best judge inshallah. mdm kaisera was my teacher in F.7/2 college and she never needed such cheap tactics as mentioned in that letter. she is too busy for these things. this letter people shd come infront with their names if they are so obliged to write such false accusations, if tehy are true wht are they afraid of ? why hiding? allah will be on their side....right???

3. Hello, Is there a link to this blog post or is it just a hidden accusation? Please make it public if this is true because this is serious or the routine IIUI conspiracy tactic?